Thursday, March 26, 2009

Who says you can't live over 50?


No need to hang up your running shoes as you age Revealed!

Here is there story....


(CNN) -- Amanda Wagner and Jessica Tuttle turn 50 this year, but they're not letting age hold them back from their favorite exercise: running. They've been lacing up their running shoes since their teens and show few signs of slowing down. Research on older runners suggests they may not have to.
Jessica Tuttle, 50, left, and Amanda Wagner, 49, have been running for more than 30 years.

Jessica Tuttle, 50, left, and Amanda Wagner, 49, have been running for more than 30 years.

"It's a little bit harder, but that's part of the challenge I think," says Wagner.

When she isn't traveling for her job at a pharmaceutical company, Wagner tries to get together with Tuttle for 45-minute pre-work runs three to five days a week. Tuttle, who is a medical epidemiologist at the Georgia Health Department, feels that running gets her day off to a good start.

"It really wakes me up in the morning," says Tuttle. "It gives me an edge when I go in to work."

Conventional wisdom holds that the pounding from years of running leads to excessive wear and tear on the body as we age, resulting in joint injuries, knee replacements or arthritis. So-called weekend warriors -- people who aren't in the type of shape needed to safely run sprints, dive for passes or make cuts on the basketball court -- add to this misconception when they hobble into their doctors' office after an injury.

But a study out of Stanford University that looked at healthy aging runners found that running did not damage joints or leave runners less able to exercise. Researchers discovered that if you're healthy and generally free of injury, there are few reasons to put away your running shoes, even into your 70s and 80s. Video Watch more on running as you age »

"Moderate [running], three to five miles at a time, three times a week will actually help your joints to be more resilient and function a little bit better," says Dr. Amadeus Mason at Emory Sports Medicine Center in Atlanta, Georgia. But he stresses that keeping the joints healthy in the first place may be the key to running longevity.
Don't Miss

* Signs you're too sick to work out
* Can your company force you to be healthy?

That includes not running through pain, and resting if you have an injury, something Tuttle takes seriously. "I try to rest maybe if I'm having some specific pain that seems to be over a couple of days," she says.

Mason also warns against running if you suffer from a chronic knee injury. In this case, the continuous pounding could accelerate damage and lead to arthritis. Instead, choose joint-friendly exercises such as swimming, walking or a workout machine such as the elliptical.

Even if you have remained healthy, as Wagner and Tuttle have, don't get overzealous and overdo it.

"The biggest risk that runners will face as they age, with regard to injury, is overtraining, by far," says Mason, who recommends giving yourself a day of rest between runs, or cross-training on the non-running days.

In addition, Mason advises wearing the proper footwear and making sure to stretch before and after a run.

Beyond the good news about aging joints, the Stanford researchers also discovered some surprising overall health benefits for senior runners when they compared them with non-runners of the same age: Those in the running group were less likely to die from heart trouble, stroke, cancer, neurological diseases or infection. Video Watch Dr. Gupta explain the study findings »

"The survival rate of the runners was again twice that of the controls," study author Dr. Eliza Chakravarty says. She says the findings were a surprise to the researchers.
Health Library

* MayoClinic.com: 7 benefits of regular physical activity
* MayoClinic.com: How to find the right walking shoes

Additionally, runners enjoyed a better day-to-day quality of life in old age than their more sedentary peers. "Members of the running group, it took them 16 years longer to reach certain levels of disability," says Chakravarty.

"Running is not the only thing that's going to make you live longer and be healthier; it's actually probably engaging in any kind of exercise that people enjoy," notes Chakravarty. "It's never too late to start incorporating regular exercise into your routine ... health benefits can last for decades."
advertisement

But running is still the exercise of choice for Wagner and Tuttle, who have remained relatively injury-free throughout their 30-year running careers. The women don't plan to hang up their running shoes any time soon.

References:

CNN.com

Mayo Clinic


Call Me For Your FREE Fitness, Wellness & Nutritional Consultation Today! 1-800-681-9894 or 480-212-1947 e-mail fitnesselementsassociates@yahoo.com

Saturday, March 21, 2009

'Nutrition Experts weigh in on which vitamins to toss back or toss out Now'











ATLANTA, Georgia (CNN) -- Americans love to take their vitamins. More than 150 million Americans take dietary supplements according to the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a supplement industry trade group.

But what should you do? Walk through the vitamin aisle of any grocery store, and you're hit by a staggering array of options. From vitamin A to glucosamine to milk thistle (what is that, anyway?) to whey protein, it's hard to decide what to take.
Our experts (clockwise from top left): Dr. Melina Jampolis, Dr. Andrew Weil, Dr. Walter Willett, Dr. Christiane Northrup

Our experts (clockwise from top left): Dr. Melina Jampolis, Dr. Andrew Weil, Dr. Walter Willett, Dr. Christiane Northrup

That's why this week the Empowered Patient asked four experts -- all medical doctors -- what supplements they take every day. Their lists may surprise you -- they all take at least two supplements -- some take three or four or more.

Choosing a daily vitamin regimen is especially daunting in light of two new studies out this week. In the largest and longest study of its kind, researchers at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, found that vitamins C and E do nothing to protect against heart disease in men. The study, published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, also found that vitamin E even appeared to raise the risk of bleeding strokes, which, while rare, are often the most deadly. Other research on women and vitamins is also discouraging.

A study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute this week found that a daily regimen of vitamin D and calcium did not offer any protection against invasive breast cancer.

With those studies in mind, here's what our panel of experts takes every day. Video Watch for more advice about vitamins »

Dr. Andrew Weil; Age: 66; director, Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine; Drweil.com

What he takes:

1. A daily multivitamin/multimineral

2. Vitamin D. Vitamin D deficiency has been linked to breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, heart disease, and multiple sclerosis, as well as other conditions. Studies show many of us are vitamin D deficient. Weil says look on the label to make sure you're getting vitamin D3, not vitamin D2.

3. Magnesium. Lack of magnesium may lead to irritablity, muscle weakness, and irregular heartbeat.

4. Juvenon (or "Omega"), a compound believed to enhance cellular health and function. This supplement contains two nutrients, acetyl-L-carnitine and alpha lipoic acid. The company that makes Juvenon says benefits include "more energy," a "sharper mind", and "more restful sleep."
Don't Miss

* In Depth: Empowered Patient

5. Co-Q-10, a supplement that boosts coenzyme Q10, which is produced by the human body and is necessary for the basic functioning of cells. Animal studies have found that coenzyme Q10 helps the immune system work better and makes the body better able to resist certain infections and types of cancer.

Weil, author of 10 books including, "Eight Weeks to Optimum Health," says it is important to take studies, like the one in JAMA, with a grain of salt. "I believe vitamins E and C are important as part of our antioxidant defenses, even if we have not yet documented specific preventive effects," says Weil.

What not to take

Weil says men shouldn't take iron unless they've been diagnosed by a physician as having iron deficiency anemia. He also advises against men taking calcium supplements; he's concerned they could increase the risk of prostate cancer.

Dr. Christiane Northrup; Age: "50 something;" author, "The Secret Pleasures of Menopause;" Drnorthrup.com

What she takes:

1. Antioxidant supplement

2. Fish oil. Some studies have found fish oil, which contains omega 3 fatty acids, can help lower triglyceride levels, lower blood pressure, and help depression, among other uses.

3. Calcium, which can help prevent osteoporosis -- a problem in particular for older women

4. Magnesium

5. Coenzyme Q10

6. Vitamin D

Northrup, an authority on women's health and wellness and author of the new book "The Secret Pleasures of Menopause," says it is important to remember that vitamins are not drugs. They don't work the same way in the body.

"Vitamins are best taken in the correct proportions to each other," says Northrup. For example, she says if you are taking folic acid, which is a B vitamin, you'll do better when you also take the other Bs that make up the B complex. Says Northrup, "That's how nutrients occur naturally and how the body best utilizes them."

What not to take

Northrup says postmenopausal women almost never need iron, and taking too much might pose a risk for heart health.

Dr. Walter Willett; Age: 63; chairman, Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health

What he takes:

1. Multivitamin

2. Vitamin D

Willett thinks the jury is still out on vitamin E and C and heart health. "I don't think we have the final answer," says Willett, the chair of the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health. He points out that in the Women's Health Study, women receiving vitamin E experienced a statistically significant 24 percent reduction in total cardiovascular disease mortality.

What not to take

He agrees with Dr. Weil: men don't need extra calcium, and high intake might increase the risk of prostate cancer.

Dr. Melina Jampolis; Age: 38; Drmelina.com

What she takes:

1. Multivitamin

2. Calcium

3. Vitamin D

4. Omega 3

Jampolis, who practices in San Francisco, California, and specializes exclusively in nutrition for weight loss and disease prevention and treatment, says everyone should take a basic multivitamin. "I like to call it an insurance policy," she says.

What not to take

What not to take: "I'm not convinced that the 'beautiful skin' vitamins really help much -- it's much better to get the nutrients from your diet, drink water, and wear sunscreen," Jampolis says.

The bottom line

Our experts agree you shouldn't make decisions about what vitamins to take based on a single study. For example, the JAMA study findings didn't make our experts lose faith in these two vitamins.

"I believe vitamins E and C are important for optimum health as part of our antioxidant defenses, even if we have not yet documented specific preventive effects," Weil says.

The experts also agree that taking vitamins is only part of the larger puzzle. You also need to watch your diet and exercise. And, do your homework. New studies come out all the time.

Here are three sites the experts we talked to suggested "empowered patients" check out:

Mayo Clinic's drug and supplement information center
advertisement

National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements Fact Sheet

National Library of Medicine's Vitamin information page

Call Me For Your FREE Consultation Today! 1-800-681-9894 or 480-212-1947 e-mail fitnesselementsassociates@yahoo.com

Friday, March 20, 2009

' How Personal Trainers and Wellness Coaches can help prevent the Stressed and tired force' linked to military suicides by incorporating Wellness'


' How Personal Trainers and Wellness Coaches can help prevent the Stressed and tired force' linked to military suicides by incorporating Wellness Solutions'



WASHINGTON (CNN) -- An increase in the number of suicides among military personnel can be traced, in part, to a "stressed and tired force" made vulnerable by multiple deployments, a military leader said Wednesday.
Long troop deployments in Iraq, above, and Afghanistan have been cited in the rise in military suicides.

Long troop deployments in Iraq, above, and Afghanistan have been cited in the rise in military suicides.

"We must find ways to relieve some of this stress," said Gen. Peter W. Chiarelli, vice chief of staff of the Army, in testimony before the Senate Armed Services Military Personnel Subcommittee.

"I think it is the cumulative effect of deployments from 12 to 15 months," he said, adding that the longer deployments are scheduled to continue until June.

He cited long deployments, lengthy separations from family and the perceived stigma associated with seeking help as factors contributing to the suicides.

Adm. Patrick M. Walsh, vice chief of naval operations, said suicides are the third leading cause of death in the Navy.

"We must eliminate the perceived stigma, shame and dishonor of asking for help," he said.

Gen. James F. Amos, assistant commandant of the Marine Corps, said his branch of the service has incorporated education and training about suicide prevention "at all levels."

He said four of 55 mental health professionals deployed in the U.S. Central Command were recently embedded with Marines. He expressed optimism that that tactic would pay off, but he said he had no data to support his expectation.

And Gen. William M. Fraser, vice chief of staff of the Air Force, said his branch, too, was taking steps "to ensure airmen are as mentally prepared for deployment and redeployment as they are physically and professionally."

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, said the efforts have not sufficed. He noted that last year, for the first time, the suicide rate among military personnel has exceeded that of the civilian population. "What's going on?" he asked rhetorically.
Don't Miss

* Army suspects up to 18 suicides in February

The panel members made clear that, whatever is going on, it is complex. Chiarelli said the Army tallied 133 confirmed suicides last year and is still investigating another seven possible ones. At least 70 percent of the suicides had "some kind of relationship problem," he said. Often, the situation was worsened by something else, such as a financial or legal problem, he said.

And it wasn't just the trauma of war that appears to heighten the risk. The suicides were about evenly divided among those who had returned from deployment, those who were still deployed -- some on a third or fourth tour -- and those who had never been deployed, Chiarelli said.

All of the military leaders said they had too few mental health professionals in their ranks.

But Walsh said professionals are not the only people who must be trained to intervene, noting that it is often the shipmate or the battle buddy who seeks assistance for someone in need.

And Navy counselors are now asking family members for feedback that often proves more illuminating than what the sailors themselves are willing to impart, he said.

"If I survey the family, I'm going to get a different set of answers."

One reason some service personnel are reluctant to seek help from their chain of command is because they fear they will then be passed over for promotions, the panel members said.

In some cases, they pay out of their own pockets to seek help privately, Rubenstein said.

And others call civilian hotlines, one of which reported getting three calls per day this year from active-duty military personnel.

Representatives of all of the branches of the military said they have seen recent increases in suicides.

At the Pentagon, Defense Secretary William Gates said he believes the 15-month deployments "were a real strain" on many, but expressed optimism that beneficial changes are in the works.

"All the services are are addressing this problem, but the Army in particular, I think, is really going after it in a very aggressive way," he said.

But some suicides appear to defy all prevention efforts. Maj. Gen. David A. Rubenstein, deputy surgeon general of the Army, cited the case of a 33-year-old soldier who was living at home with his wife and three children.

He suffered a traumatic brain injury more than two years ago and had been giving weekly motivational speeches to other soldiers in a clinic.

For the past two years, the soldier also had been seeing a psychiatrist. The most recent visit occurred last Friday.

On Monday, he saw his primary care doctor and his nurse case manager, and also had a life-skills appointment.

"On Tuesday, he apparently committed suicide," Rubenstein said. "This soldier was treated, compliant and supported in every way, and yet he's dead today."

The suicide underscores that suicide is "a complex, very difficult problem that causes all of us to scratch our heads and wonder: how do we stop the next one?"

Last year, at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, two cadets and two members of the staff and faculty killed themselves, said Brig. Gen. Michael S. Linnington, commandant of the cadets.

He cited stress from broken relationships and, in one case, a pre-existing mental health condition that academy officials had not known about at the time of admission. None of the four had been deployed to a combat zone.

Linnington called the spate of self-directed violence at the school "troubling and unacceptable" and said preventive measures there had been beefed up in recent months.

We as Health & Fitness professionals can really help fill the need here by developing programs and a space for this need. We all know the technique of Diversion and to help these great military people cope, and deal with what they are going through. A person should not have to re-live bad experiences day in and day out we all know what that does to our psyche & pysioligy. Have a happy and healthy day!


Call Me For Your FREE Wellness Consultation Today! 1-800-681-9894 or 480-212-1947 e-mail fitnesselementsassociates@yahoo.com

Thursday, March 19, 2009

'How to Avoid Tragedy and skiing risks'


How Skiers can cut risks by wearing helmets up to 50-80%


KEYSTONE, Colorado (CNN) -- Skiers and snowboarders can cut the risk of brain injury dramatically by wearing helmets on the slopes, some experts say.
Two snowboarders at Colorado's Arapahoe Basin ski area wear helmets as they plan their runs.

Two snowboarders at Colorado's Arapahoe Basin ski area wear helmets as they plan their runs.

The death of actress Natasha Richardson this week, after a skiing accident that seemed minor at first, drew attention to the dangers of head injuries while skiing.

"Wearing a helmet is a personal decision that I chose quite a while ago," says Patrick O'Sullivan, Ski Patrol director at Arapahoe Basin ski area in Colorado."I've been doing this about 25 years and it took me half my career to decide that I wanted to wear a helmet, and I wear one pretty much every day."

O'Sullivan began wearing a helmet when he was given a free one by Dr. A. Stewart Levy, chief of neurosurgery and neurotrauma at St. Anthony Central Hospital in Denver, Colorado.

Levy began giving away helmets in 1997 to ski patrollers and instructors across the Rocky Mountains in an effort to raise awareness about helmet use. By last year, he had given away 1,000 helmets. He also gave hundreds more to rental shops so they could loan them to skiers and snowboarders who were renting equipment.

Levy says he's done a study ­-- not published, but presented to conferences -- ­ that looked at cases from 1998 through 2005. He says helmets reduced the risk of brain injury by 75 percent. Other studies show a reduction in brain injuries of 50 percent to 80 percent, Levy says.
Don't Miss

* Natasha Richardson dies after ski fall
* 'Minor' head injuries can turn serious, experts say
* TIME.com: Could a helmet have helped?

But he says a helmet is just part of the recipe for a safe day on the slopes.

"A helmet does not prevent all brain injuries and other types of injuries," Levy cautions. "So you still have to ski responsibly. A helmet is not a license to ski recklessly."

O'Sullivan agrees. At Arapahoe Basin, they don't counsel skiers one way or the other on wearing helmets; they leave it up to individuals. But O'Sullivan encourages everyone to be aware of the conditions on the mountain and their own abilities on the slopes.

He says accidents pick up in the afternoon -- a time ski patrollers call the "witching hour" -- when skiers begin to get tired and may take on challenges they can't handle.

"You've got to know your abilities and take every day as a fresh day," he says. "Know where you are skiing, know what the conditions are -- things change very rapidly."

Forty-three percent of U.S. skiers and boarders wear helmets, according to a 2008 survey by the National Ski Areas Association, the trade group that represents ski resorts as well as ski gear manufacturers. That's up from 25 percent in 2003.

NSAA strongly recommends helmet usage. "We urge skiers and snowboarders to wear a helmet, but to ski or ride as if they're not wearing one" so they don't get careless, says Dave Byrd, director of education and risk for the group.

Byrd backs up Levy and O'Sullivan's argument that what's going on inside the skier's head is as important as the equipment on the outside.

"Our position is the skier's behavior has as much or more to do with the safety of the sport as does any piece of equipment." he says. "The most important thing is being a responsible skier or snowboarder."

The association says that despite the increase in helmet use, deaths on the slopes have remained fairly constant.

"What we've found is that helmet usage did not affect fatalities," Byrd says.

He says helmets tend to be helpful in preventing lesser head injuries such as scalp lacerations or mild concussions. Recreational ski and snowboard helmets are manufactured to a standard that provides protection at 14 mph or less, whereas it is common to ski and snowboard between 25 and 40 mph, he says.

"So when you're going at that speed and you hit a fixed object like a tree, whether you're wearing a helmet isn't going to matter," Byrd says.

A NSAA fact sheet says in 2006, there were 2.07 skiing/snowboarding fatalities per million participants, fewer than for bicycling or swimming. The group says a person is twice as likely to die from being struck by lightning as in a skiing or snowboarding accident.

About half of the skiers and snowboarders at Arapahoe Basin on Wednesday were wearing helmets.

Snowboarder Dave Millman, visiting from Massachusetts, says he learned the value of a helmet the hard way.

"I've been wearing one now for five or six years," he says. "I picked it up after skiing through the trees a lot and taking too many branches to the head -- so I thought it was a good idea to throw the cranium cap on."

As the sun dips over the mountain during the "witching hour," a novice snowboarder wipes out near the ski lift, the back of his head whacking the hard-packed snow. He isn't wearing a helmet.

His name is Mika Babcock and it is his first time snowboarding. He is a student at Purdue University in Indiana, visiting on spring break. He has already fallen and hit his head several times on Wednesday.

Babcock is skeptical that a helmet, which generally doesn't cover the face, would help.

"That fall you witnessed was actually the first time I cracked the back of my head. Usually it's the front," he says. "Do I regret not wearing one? No, not really. It's not too bad and I know what a concussion feels like, so I know I'm good so far."

Babcock decides not to have the Ski Patrol give him the once-over. Instead he heads to the lodge for a quick rest before hitting the slopes again. "I'm probably going to sit down for a little bit and let my head clear up."

We all need to play and practice Sports safely for Sure! Please hire a Professional for any learning, education, and safety matters! Have a healthy and safe day!

Forwarded By, Natalie Pyles

Fitness & Nutritional Expert, Author, Speaker

Call Me For Your FREE Fitness Consultation or Performance Coaching Analysis Today!
1-800-681-9894 or 480-212-1947 e-mail fitnesselementsassociates@yahoo.com

Thursday, March 12, 2009

'How to Apply Protein Quality, Form & Function'


What athletes should consider in order to achieve optimal physical performance.

High-protein diets—and their promises of muscle gain, weight loss and improved health—appeal to a wide diversity of people, from athletes to dieters. But how much and what kind of protein is best? More important, does the scientific research support the potential health benefits of this macronutrient?

This article will review protein function; highlight the latest research on the health benefits and risks of a high-protein diet; and offer fitness professionals practical tips on how to choose protein sources and appropriately (and within the scope of practice) answer clients’ questions.

Protein Function

Proteins, made from chains of amino acids, form the major structural component of our muscles, brain, nervous system, blood, skin and hair. This important macronutrient serves as the transport mechanism for iron, vitamins, minerals, fats and oxygen within the body; and it is also vital to maintaining acid-base and fluid balance.

Proteins form enzymes that speed up chemical reactions and create antibodies that the body uses to fight infection. In situations of energy deprivation, the body can break down proteins for fuel. With all of protein’s many important functions, our bodies are well served by getting the right kind and the correct amount of high-quality proteins.

Protein Quality

All proteins are made up of some combination of amino acids, most of which the body manufactures. However, there are nine amino acids that the body cannot make; these nine—referred to as essential amino acids—must be consumed in the diet.

A specific food’s protein quality is determined by assessing its essential amino acid composition, digestibility and bioavailability, which is the degree to which any amino acid can be used by the body. Generally, animal products contain all of the nine essential amino acids (called complete proteins), whereas plant foods do not and are thus considered incomplete proteins. One notable exception to this rule is soy, which is a plant-based complete protein. That’s why animal proteins and soy are better sources of quality protein than other plants. However, you can boost protein quality and get all the essential amino acids you need by combining complementary incomplete plant proteins. Excellent combinations of incomplete plant proteins include grains with legumes (e.g., rice and beans); grains with dairy (e.g., pasta and cheese); or legumes with seeds (e.g., a Greek dish called falafel).

Several scales are used to evaluate protein quality. However, the most widely used and most accepted method is called the protein digestibility–corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS). The proteins with the highest (i.e., best) PDCAAS scores are whey, casein, egg, milk and soy proteins (Hoffman & Falvo 2004). Beef comes in next, followed by black beans, peanuts and wheat gluten (Hoffman & Falvo 2004).

Protein Digestion and Absorption

The goal of digestion is to break down dietary protein into individual amino acids that can be absorbed and later used. The body’s need for dietary protein results from the constant breakdown and regeneration of the body’s cells. The immediate supply of amino acids for cell regeneration comes from the body’s free amino acid pool, which comprises amino acids from dietary sources along with recycled amino acids from cell turnover. Because amino acid recycling is inherently inefficient, dietary amino acid intake is necessary to replace losses.

Each protein is determined by its amino acid composition. For a protein to be digested, it must first lose its unique shape; this process is called denaturation. Adding acid, salt or heat to meat products facilitates denaturation, making proteins more available to digestive enzymes (Mahan & Escott-Stump 2000). Vegetable protein is not as well digested as animal protein because it is less available to digestive enzymes. Some plants (e.g., soybeans) contain enzymes that interfere with digestion (Mahan & Escott-Stump 2000). Food processing can damage amino acids and reduce their availability for digestion.

Protein digestion begins in the stomach with the action of the enzyme pepsin, which denatures the proteins and starts to break the bonds that hold amino acids together. The stomach mixes and churns the food and then releases the mixture to the small intestine in little amounts over the course of 1–4 hours. The pancreas releases enzymes into the small intestine, which further breaks down the proteins into amino acids, and these are then absorbed into the bloodstream and carried to the liver. In the liver, two things can happen: either the amino acids are converted into carbohydrate, or they enter the amino acid pool.

In a healthy body, the amount of protein taken in should exactly match the amount of protein excreted in feces, urine and skin. Muscle mass is maintained, with a fraction of muscle protein being destroyed and an equal amount being rebuilt daily using amino acids from the amino acid pool. During periods of muscle growth, protein synthesis exceeds protein destruction and excretion (Mahan & Escott-Stump 2000).

Protein Types

Apart from egg, meat, fish and poultry, the highest-quality protein sources are milk, the milk components whey and casein, and soy.

Whey is one of the two major milk proteins; the other is casein. Whey is the liquid that remains after the milk has been curdled and strained. There are three varieties of whey: whey protein powder, whey protein concentrate and whey protein isolate, all of which provide high levels of the essential amino acids, as well as vitamins and minerals. Whey powder is 11%–15% protein and is used as an additive in many food products (Hoffman & Falvo 2004). Whey concentrate is 25%–89% protein, whereas whey isolate has a protein content of 90% or greater; both concentrate and isolate are commonly used in dietary supplements (Hoffman & Falvo 2004). It should be noted that while the isolate form is nearly pure whey, some proteins can be lost during the manufacturing process. Unlike the other whey forms, isolate is lactose-free (Hoffman & Falvo 2004).

Studies have found that whey protein offers numerous health benefits (see the sidebar “Health Benefits of Whey Protein”). Whey contains high levels of the amino acids that play an important role in muscle hypertrophy (Hayes & Cribb 2008; Krissansen 2007). Whey is rapidly digested and absorbed; it also has a remarkable ability to stimulate muscle protein synthesis, even more so than casein and soy (Hayes & Cribb 2008).

Casein, which gives milk its white color, accounts for 70%–80% of milk’s protein (Hoffman & Falvo 2004). Casein provides a sustained, slow release of amino acids into the bloodstream, sometimes lasting for hours (Hoffman & Falvo 2004). Some studies suggest that combining casein and whey may produce the greatest muscular strength improvements after an intensive resistance training program (Kerksick et al. 2006).

Soy is the most widely used vegetable protein source. It is the only vegetable protein that contains all nine essential amino acids. Similar to whey, soy proteins can be divided into three types: soy flour (50% protein), which is often used in baked goods; soy concentrate (70% protein), which is commonly added to nutrition bars, cereals and yogurts; and soy isolate (90% protein) (Hoffman & Falvo 2004). Soy isolate is highly digestible and easily added to sports drinks, health beverages and infant formulas (Hoffman & Falvo 2004).

Early studies indicated that soy might

  • lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and blood pressure;
  • protect against breast cancer;
  • maintain bone density; and
  • decrease menopausal symptoms (Hoffman & Falvo 2004).

Unfortunately, subsequent studies have failed to confirm the early research. In fact, the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association (AHA) released an advisory in 2006 warning against soy or isoflavone (a component in soy) supplementation (Sacks et al. 2006). However, the AHA did recommend increasing daily intake of soy products (such as tofu, soy burgers and soy nuts), which contain high levels of heart-healthy polyunsaturated fats, fiber, vitamins and minerals and low levels of saturated fat (Sacks et al. 2006).

General Protein Recommendations

Resistance training and cardiovascular exercise induce beneficial muscular and structural damage. Because protein helps the muscles and tissues repair and rebuild themselves, the American Dietetic Association (ADA), Dietitians of Canada (DOC) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) suggest that athletes have higher protein needs than the general population. These agencies advise endurance athletes to consume about 1.2–1.4 grams per kilogram (g/kg) (0.5–0.6 grams per pound [g/lb]), whereas strength-trained athletes should consume up to 1.6–1.7 g/kg (0.7–0.8 g/lb) (ADA, DOC & ACSM 2000). However, a 2005 report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) concluded that there was no compelling scientific evidence to support active individuals’ increasing their daily protein intake above the 0.8 g/kg (0.4 g/lb) per day recommended for the general population (IOM 2005).

Since the IOM report was issued, there has been much confusion and misinterpretation of the agency’s protein recommendations, especially as they relate to athletes’ needs. What many critics fail to realize is that the protein intake of 0.8 g/kg (0.4 g/lb) reflects the recommended dietary allowance (RDA), which is the minimum daily intake level that meets the nutrient requirements of nearly all healthy individuals; the RDA is not meant to be an ideal or maximal intake level.

Some who question the IOM findings note that a variety of studies have shown that higher levels of protein intake support muscle mass, strength and function; bone health; maintenance of energy balance; cardiovascular function; and wound health (Wolfe & Miller 2008). These researchers suggest that the ideal protein intake should be based on the acceptable macronutrient distribution range (AMDR), which is 10%–35% of daily energy intake (Wolfe & Miller 2008).

Benefits and Risks of a High-Protein Diet

Research is now emerging as to the benefits and risks associated with higher protein consumption, including whether or not protein induces weight loss, improves athletic performance and can be readily incorporated into a vegetarian diet.

While low-carbohydrate/high-protein diets, such as the Atkins or South Beach plans, may no longer be the hottest trend, some studies have shown that for weight loss and health benefits these diets are just as good as—and sometimes better than—the standard low-fat/high-carbohydrate diet (Foster et al. 2003; Gardner et al. 2007; Dansinger et al. 2005). Low-carb/high-protein diets contribute to weight loss through several mechanisms. The initial weight loss on these diets is largely attributable to a diuretic effect from the low intake of carbohydrates, which results in rapid early water loss. These diets also contribute to glycogen depletion (which may be detrimental for endurance athletes) and metabolic ketosis, which leads to decreased appetite and decreased caloric intake (St. Jeor et al. 2001).

Early studies have shown that the Atkins diet produced greater initial weight reduction at 3 and 6 months than other diets studied, but a year later, weight loss was the same as it was for the other diets (Foster et al. 2003). A randomized trial that compared the Atkins, Zone, Ornish and LEARN (similar to the federal MyPyramid guidelines) diets found that the Atkins dieters lost more weight and had an improved health profile at 1 year (Gardner et al. 2007). The overall consensus among health experts is that it does not matter what type of diet a person chooses as long as he or she can stick to it, which is difficult to do regardless of which plan you pick (Dansinger et al. 2005).

Protein plays important roles in endurance and resistance training exercise. Both modes of exercise stimulate muscle protein synthesis (Phillips 2006), which is further enhanced if protein is consumed around the time of the physical activity (Hayes & Cribb 2008). Consumption of protein immediately after exercising helps in the repair and synthesis of muscle proteins. Protein intake during exercise probably does not offer any additional performance benefit if sufficient amounts of carbohydrate—the body’s preferred energy source—are consumed. However, for endurance athletes who need to consume adequate calories to fuel extended training sessions, or for any exerciser striving to lose weight, research suggests that protein can preserve lean muscle mass and ensure that most weight loss comes from fat rather than lean tissue (Phillips 2006).

While these may seem like great reasons to boost your daily protein intake, it is worth noting that most people habitually consume far more protein than they need (ADA, DOC & ACSM 2000). Protein consumption beyond recommended amounts is unlikely to result in further muscle gains because the body has a limited capacity to utilize amino acids to build muscle (ADA, DOC & ACSM 2000).

With good planning, vegetarians can consume a diet that contains adequate amounts of high-quality proteins. Legumes, dried beans, peas, nuts, soy and meat alternatives provide ample protein; however, few vegetarian foods provide all of the essential amino acids, which is why vegetarians must consume a variety of complementary protein-rich plant foods throughout the day.

Because plant proteins are not as readily digested as animal proteins, vegetarian athletes should consume about 10% more grams of protein than other athletes (ADA, DOC & ACSM 2000). For example, experts recommend that nonvegetarian athletes typically consume a 3,000-calorie diet with 10% of calories gleaned from protein; that works out to be about 300 calories (75g) derived from protein. However, a vegetarian athlete with the same caloric intake per day should consume about 30 extra protein calories (8g), for a total daily consumption of approximately 330 protein calories (300 plus 30).

What About Protein Supplements?

Many athletes use protein supplements to boost their protein intake and to consume a particular protein type or amino acid. The billion-dollar supplement industry has been quick to respond to increased consumer demand for protein products.

However, because the research findings are inconsistent and little is known about the safety of these products, the ADA advises against individual amino acid supplementation and against protein supplementation overall (ADA, DOC & ACSM 2000). While some supplements may in fact provide health benefits, generally speaking, consumers should purchase and use these products cautiously, as they are not closely regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Importantly, no matter how safe some dietary products appear to be, fitness professionals should never recommend supplements to clients.

What to Tell Your Clients About Protein

When discussing high-protein diets with your clients, stay within your scope of practice.

  • Never advocate a particular diet to a client!
  • Encourage clients to get their protein from whole foods rather than supplements, as the ADA recommends (ADA, DOC & ACSM 2000).
  • Refer clients to a registered dietitian for help designing a balanced high-protein diet, whenever appropriate.

Keep in mind the following considerations:

  • Total daily protein intake should not be excessive and should be reasonably proportional (~15% of total caloric intake) to carbohydrate (~55% of total caloric intake) and fat (~30% of total caloric intake) (St. Jeor et al. 2001).
  • Not all proteins are created equally. Other than soy, vegetable proteins are incomplete proteins. Vegetarians and those who eat limited amounts of animal products should consume a wide variety of high-protein vegetarian foods.
  • Carbohydrates should not be omitted or severely restricted when upping protein intake, especially by athletes who need large amounts of carbohydrate to fuel optimal performance. A minimum of 100 g of carbohydrate per day is recommended (St. Jeor et al. 2001).
  • Selected protein foods should not contribute excess total fat, saturated fat or cholesterol to the diet (St. Jeor et al. 2001).
  • The eating plan should be safely implemented so as to provide adequate nutrients (St. Jeor et al. 2001).

The Protein Promise

The jury is still out on the best amounts, mechanisms and methods of protein intake. However, a large body of research shows that—when combined with regular exercise and an overall healthy lifestyle—protein can live up to its promises of muscle gain, weight loss and improved health.

Natalie Digate Muth, MD, MPH, RD, is a recent graduate of the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. She is also a registered dietitian and an ACE master trainer.
References
American Dietetic Association (ADA), Dietitians of Canada (DOC) & American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). 2000. Position of the American Dietetic Association, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and athletic performance. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100 (12), 1543–56.

Dangin, M., et al. 2002. Influence of the protein digestion rate on protein turnover in young and elderly subjects. Journal of Nutrition, 132, 3228S–33S.

Dansinger, M.L., et al. 2005. Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293 (1), 43–53.

Foster, G.D., et al. 2003. A randomized trial of a low-carbohydrate diet for obesity. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348 (21), 2082–90.

Gardner, C.D., et al. 2007. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297 (9), 969–77.

Harvard School of Public Health. 2009. The Nutrition Source. Protein: Moving closer to center stage. www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/what-should-you-eat/protein-full-story/index.html; retrieved Jan. 13, 2009.

Hayes, A., & Cribb, P.J. 2008. Effect of whey protein isolate on strength, body composition, and muscle hypertrophy during resistance training. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 11, 40–44.

Hoffman, J.R., & Falvo, M.J. 2004. Protein: Which Is best? Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 3, 118–30.

Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2005. Food and Nutrition Board. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Kerksick, C.M., et al. 2006. The effects of protein and amino acid supplementation on performance and training adaptations during ten weeks of resistance training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20 (3), 643–53.

Krissansen, G.W. 2007. Emerging health properties of whey proteins and their clinical implications. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 26 (6), 713S–23S.

Mahan, L.K., & Escott-Stump, S. 2000. Krause’s Food, Nutrition & Diet Therapy (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.

Phillips, S.M. 2006. Dietary protein for athletes: from requirements to metabolic advantage. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, & Metabolism, 31, 647–54.

Sacks, F.M., et al. 2006. Soy protein, isoflavones, and cardiovascular health: An American Heart Association science advisory for professionals from the nutrition committee. Circulation, 113, 1034–44.

St. Jeor, S.T., et al. 2001. Dietary protein and weight reduction: A statement for healthcare professionals from the nutrition committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation, 104, 1869–74.

Wolfe, R.R., & Miller, S.L. 2008. The Recommended Dietary Allowance of protein. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299 (24), 2891–93.


Forwarded By, Natalie Pyles

Fitness & Weight-loss Expert, Licensed Sports Nutritionist, Author, Speaker, & Consultant

Call Me For Your FREE Consultation Today! 1-800-681-9894 or 480-212-1947 e-mail fitnesselementsassociates@yahoo.com